
Not to be specific or anything, but i am all too familiar with bedrooms and philosophy mixing up my pretty little head..
Recently, the Marquis de Sade has been my book of choice.. Usually by the light of candles.. smoking on the porch at dusk. Last summer just before the move back to the west coast i remember reading The Misfortunes of Virtue..not completely realizing the Marquis real-world usefulness on this subject.
Now, reading Philosophy in the Bedroom and getting past some of the more-comical-than-sensual scenes (how very familiar), i stumble upon the character Dolmance’s opinion of most all virtues. Charity, Chastity, Benevolence…all are just as self-serving but more destructive to society than any Vice in his eyes. It seems a simple statement to me, not ringing really true..although it could be true that Benevolence to the undeserving, or anyone at all really,,, breeds complacency. It is a disservice to the furtherance of their personal evolution.
Begone those virtues which produce naught but ingratitude !
(Benevolence) accustoms the poor man to doles which provoke the deterioration of his energy ; when able to expect your charities, he ceases to work and becomes, when they fail him, a thief or assassin.
Applying this theory now..or maybe only to ungrateful evil-doers. I think there are some holes in the Marquis’ logic.
One cannot always do evil ; deprived of the pleasure it affords, we can at least find the sensation’s equivalent in the minor but piquant wickedness of never doing good.
-Philosophy in the Bedroom